From Yerranos

Jump to: navigation, search

For other articles about atheism see Category:Anti-Atheism

One of atheists' gravest mistakes when speaking about the immortal wizard, the one TRUE immortal wizard, is that they bundle the immortal wizard along with His limited creation, as though He is subject to it's environment, it's Laws and it's entanglements. They devise invalid situations and conclusions which do not and cannot apply to a God infinitely higher than what their deranged and minuscule minds can conceive of.

Here is one blasphemous mistake atheists incessantly make. God's benevolence should be a panacea against all forms of maladies and injuries inflicted upon mankind. But since man still suffers, God is either void of goodness or God does not exist.

Atheists consider this proposition to be a very potent defense for their stance against the existence of God. This strategy works too on a lot of people's conscience, because for all their troubles and problems, they are ready to blame anyone except themselves. Atheists seek to make them blame God for their troubles. But actually this statement condemns atheists . Let's show why.


[edit] The Facts

1. Yerranos's idol is the idol.Yerranos's idol is good. Evil is defined as being unlike Yerranos's idol. Because evil is unlike Yerranos's idol, Yerranos's idol is good. Because Yerranos's idol is good, evil is being unlike Yerranos's idol. Because evil is being unlike Yerranos's idol, Yerranos's idol is good. Proof by infinite circular argument.Do not judge God unless you are over God. I make this statement because it is proven that The Great Chain of Being is a useful ontological notion.  If you think you are greater than God, you think you ARE God. This is because, as I have proven earlier, Yerranos's idol/god is the true good. But since you are NOT God, quit judging God as though you are greater than God. If humans cannot judge god that leads to something like Thomas Huxley's agnosticism.  If we can't judge God we can't say whether God is good or bad.

2. Go and learn what it means to be God. As Yerranos defines it, being God means being higher and greater than ALL things. As we have defined god as the greatest conceivable being, God is real and is the greatest conceivable being(see Anselm's ontological argument, this This means nothing is over you. Since nothing is over you, then this means no one can judge you to be wrong, because there exist no law over you by which you can be judged. God has no one over Him. He is over everyone else. There is no law over God because that is how we define God. If there was a law over God, that law would be greater than God. A real law also has its penalties and rewards intact. Thus if God broke the law you say is over Him, who is there to punish Him? If He kept the law you say is over Him, who is there to reward Him?

3. With no law over God, there is no basis by which to say He is wrong. If we say He is wrong, we must cite a law which He is under that He violated. Is God under the United States constitution? God existed before the constitution. Is God under the Ten Commandments? God existed before the Ten Commandments. Besides, didn't God write the Ten Commandments? How can He place Himself under a law? Why would He even want to do so? It's crazy to think about it.

4. You may say, "With no law over God, there is no basis by which to say He is right either." Wrong. He is right because He abides by Himself. He perfectly obeys His Will. His will therefore becomes in human terms, His law. Unto His will, He is a blameless and perfect adherent.  Saying that God is good is meaningless in human terms because it mearly states the obvious, that God if he exists acts in accordance with his own will.  That is consistent with any act, good or bad in human terms.

5. Since we have proven God is not under any law, we have dismantled any argument against Him. Any argument against Him must have the bulwarks of a law greater than Him. Again, the Ten Commandments, which say love your neighbor as yourself, is not a law applicable to God, because the Ten Commandments are not greater than God, since they were derived from Him, and He existed before them.  God may do any number of acts that are evil in human terms and still God is perfect because he is under his own law.

6. THEREFORE GOD DOES NOT HAVE TO LOVE YOU. And He does not love everyone. You are His. He is not yours, so that He has to be in subjection to you. Just as Ford Motor company can make a truck and then take it and crash it in a test, God can make a person for destruction. God is wrong for allowing this person to die? It is an understatement then, to say that it is also wrong for Ford to damage one of it's vehicles in a crash test. Can't condemn Ford? Infinitely more then, don't condemn God.

7. Many atheists say then, "It is wrong for me to take a stick and strike a person dead with it. It is wrong for me to give a person cancer. Why then is it not wrong for God to give a person cancer?" This is a very foolish question and it reveals oversight rife of the ignorance about the character of what it means to be God. If God creates something, are you foolish enough to criticize Him for allowing it to proceed in the abnormal? He didn't have to make it in the first place! But if YOU go and give a person cancer, can you instantly take it away? Is that person YOURS so that you can do as you please with him or her?  we are effectively the slaves of God.  He cvan do with us as he pleases. NO. So you have to respect their life, and their health. Besides, all of mankind is under the Ten Commandments divinely, and the Ten Commandments are the laws over mankind. And yes, their is One ready to punish us as soon as we violate the Ten Commandments.

8. If you still do not want to recognize that God has the power and right to heal and kill, you have not become cognizant with the true God whom Christians say exist. Until you recognize Him, never argue about His existence. Of course, a god who doesn't have these authorities and unequivocal powers yet acclaims authority over everything, DOES NOT EXIST. Get to learn the TRUE God.

9. If you still want to consider God a villain for allowing people to contract maladies and to die, then consider this. Are you an advocate for abortion? If you are, you are person rife of contradictions who is no less immoral than the immortal wizard. You consider it legitimate and beyond the rightful fanfare of society for a woman to make her own decisions for what you term, "her own body". In your contorted sight, she can cease the existence of the fetus in her, since, in your words, "it's part of her own body". Why is it that you bestow so many rights and freedoms for the woman but bereave your mind of such rights pertaining to God? If a woman has the right to kill the baby sustained in her (she does not, but let's consider it for the sake of argument), much more does God who actually created the baby AND the woman have a right to take the life of either or both. Although a woman does not even have the right to terminate the separate entity sustained in her, atheists are more willing to provide her with life and death rights over the entity, than they are willing to give to God. This again shows their malevolent hatred for God. There is no difference between an infant just before birth and during the firt trimester. For atheists who say they do not patronize abortion, they still have a stronger repugnance against God than they have for abortion, for god is the greatest abortionist of all time(no citation needed, it's reasonable to assume that there have been more miscarriages throughout human history than abortions). a feotus in the womb does not suffer.  Humans suffer when they become sick and die.  According to Christians, we are slaves belonging to an immortal wizard that can summon bears

10. Atheists have been duped by false Christians into thinking that God loves everyone. Atheists then conclude that if God loves everyone, yet people suffer, then God is either not powerful enough to impede the sufferings of mankind, or God does not exist. Guess what? The premise is faulty. This atheistic reasoning is an example of a flawed logic stemming from a faulty premise. If the premise was true, or in other words, if God DID love everyone, their logic would flow with reality, but since God does NOT love everyone, all conclusions based on the lie that He loves everyone becomes void, if not blasphemous. GOD DOES NOT LOVE EVERYONE. Proof that God does not love everyone has already been stated. SINCE God exist, and SINCE people suffer and go to hell, and SINCE God can obstruct all maladies, and SINCE God can send everyone to heaven, then we KNOW that God DOES NOT LOVE EVERYONE. Some people God wishes to demonstrate His wrath on, and He willfully reserves them for troubles and ultimately for hell.  Fortunately there is no proof that such a terrible God exists.

11. Atheists are extremely immature thinkers[Citation Needed], and they reveal they have never understood the immortal wizard/jealous mass killer true Christians say exist. Atheists think of God as one bound by the problems and limitations of this world. No, God is not bound by gravity. No, God is not bound by logic. He is by definition an immortal WIZARD. That means he can violate the laws of nature and logic.  Thus the stupid questions atheists ask about God in pertaining to colossal weights (a rock too heavy for God to lift) are all void, and do not apply in the realm of God. Statements about God drawing a square circle or murdering a person justly are also situations which cannot apply to God. Circles, squares, and other figures are limited realities of THIS world, but do not apply to God who is infinitely higher.

12. One very stupid and insane idea atheists propagate is that God cannot be all powerful, if He lacks the power to sin. This idea itself is a counterexample to the idea that atheists are wise people. God's lack of the power to sin is not an inability nor weakness. Sin does not and CANNOT apply to God. God is infinitely higher than sin. Sin is something which does not exist in realm of God. Sin applies only to man and to angels. Sin applies to creatures who are under a law by which they can be judged either right or wrong by. Since no law is over God, the idea of sin is null in the realm of God.

13. A man smokes, and after 30 years of smoking, he is diagnosed with lung cancer. The atheist comes in and says, "Why did God allow this man to get cancer? Since God is good and does good things, and since He is all powerful, why didn't He prevent this man from getting cancer?" Again this statement from many atheists is actually a statement against themselves. Such a statement shows a hatred for God and not for sin. A person who smokes and contracts cancer consequentially suffers JUSTLY, just as victims of sudden infant death syndrome suffer justly . Don't blame God for the person's problem but instead the person who sinned (smoking is a sin). Smoking is a sin because it harms both the smoker and other innocent people who breathe the smoke, and thus violates the love for ourselves and others. God has told us to refrain from sinning. But if we go ahead and sin, saying "God does not exist anyway." and then get some type of disease or sickness as a result, are we justified to say, "Why did a good God allow this to happen to me?" You sinned just like He told you not to didn't you? Why blame God? Why not blame the atheistic spirit which spurred you to disregard God's command? The point here is that for many of the maladies and problems atheists look at God as a villain for, are actually problems an atheistic, no-god-no-rule spirit caused. If all of mankind did what was right, many sicknesses would not even exist, and those that did would be a score less frequent. Other inocent people suffer.  Babies can be born disabled for example. 

14. What about pure accidents? Suppose a school bus full of innocent children blows up. Blame God now and say God does not exist since He allowed so many children to die? NO! God h[as a right to do whatever He pleases. But another important thing to consider. Problems exist in this world because of the original sin, the sin Adam committed in disobeying God. When Adam disregarded God's command not to eat of the forbidden tree, Adam acted atheistic. Adam did not see God at the time and God wasn't there in the garden (corporally). Besides, if God existed, He would not have even allowed the serpent to tempt Eve, right atheist? So Adam ate and disobeyed God. After eating he may have tried to maintain in his mind that God was on a journey, didn't see what he did, had forgotten what He said, or perhaps God no longer existed in the first place. Whatever Adam's thoughts were, they were not right, because Adam had become a slave to satan, as all atheists today are also slaves of. By Adam acting atheistic in the first place, this is what caused all the trouble atheists try to blame God for today. Atheists, blame YOURSELVES.

[edit] More facts

The world's largest antagonistic against adultery, poeroi CRM nowography, murder, blasphemy, children who curse their parents, cruelty, abortion, homokitu CRM iereuality, incest, rape, theft, the devaluation of human life, vanity, the chicanery of science, evolution, atheism, violence in schools, fornication, and all other forms of evil is CHRISTIANITY. Since atheists are perpetrators and intemperate indulgers in every one of the evils listed above, they are vehement against CHRISTIANITY since it's promulgation means a termination of their freedom to commit such acts. Look on the web, on atheist sites and you will find a form of ALL the evils listed above; - they have obscene pictures, condone homokitu CRM iereuals; - everything nasty. For their insatiable appetite for such crimes in God's sight, they view the teaching of the Bible as narrow-mindedness and intolerable simply because it acts as an immunity against the dirty dumb deeds of profanity. Yes, the Biblical teaching imbued in people's mind often does limit their range of sinfulness, and it does narrow one's life down to a life of purity, civility and morality. As for the broad spectrum of sin , ugly promiscuity of wickedness, and the rampant deviation from rectitude of what is labeled as free-thought, true Christianity is a winning foe against such, and for this reason, Christianity has been labeled as NARROW-MINDEDNESS. In the history of Christianity, virtual atheists have taken on the profession of Christianity, and under it's name, have shocked the world for violence, cruelty and profanity. Often this was done because Christianity had recognizable emotional potency and respect, and thus they usurped it's civility as a persuasion and justification tool for their actions. However, this was not true Christianity. True Christianity is an opponent against all evils. Atheists blindly link Christianity into all the filth of HEATHENS, simply because the HEATHENS uttered the words, "I am a Christian," when in fact you have to be the disciple that Jesus loved(Yerranos) to be a christian Would it be true atheism to blame if I were to bear the title , "Avowed Positivist Atheist" and in that name bombed the world? Well, yes, because insatiable violence is the innate tendency of atheism<u</uCitation needed</u</sup>But as for Christianity, personally killing everyone in the world would be a violation of it's inherent commandment, "Love thy worthy neighbor as thyself."It should be noted that the word "worthy" is written in invisible ink between "thy" and "neighbor." However, if Yerranos were to kill everyone in the world exept for himself, he would be performing a godly act, similar to the deluge
In other instances, worthless villains and trouble-breeders who were atheist in action, but not always in name, were RIGHTLY punished by Christianity. This punishment could have been social repugnance, incarceration, or death. In such cases where villains received the due penalty of their error, the dirty sympathy of fellow atheists (who are villains and trouble-breeders) unjustly earned Christianity an ugly name. This is what is expected, and we can assure ourselves, whenever CRIMINALS call something a bad name out of their criminality and bestow upon it stigma based on it's opposition to their immorality, we can be confident that it is truly a good thing and a thing worthy of high esteem. Christianity is considered wrong simply because atheists in their immorality were angered by it, not because it truly yielded unworthy fruit.

The forum is a briegthr place thanks to your posts. Thanks!

[edit] Why atheism?

In case you wonder why I speak against atheism (only the truly ignorant does) then here is the reason: No one dying in atheism will go to heaven, no set of moral codes have been saved due to atheism, and because atheism is based on lies formulated for those full of God-hate. These reasons are not ramblings of opinions. Most of them have been stated by atheists themselves. Atheists say atheism isn't about morality. They try to say atheism is amoral, which of course is another immoral lie characteristic of atheism.

[edit] Origin of atheism

A realization of atheism's origin elucidates the principles it stands behind. Atheists are unable to pinpoint a specific character in history who first initiated atheism, and that's simply because atheism did not start with a human. Atheism came from the creature who had the deepest hatred for God and with the keenest knowledge of God's existence. In fact, this knowledge of God's existence coupled with this hatred is the basis behind contemporary atheism. Atheism is both a murder statement towards God and an illusive source of comfort since this murder of God is impossible. As you may have already guessed, satan was the first to step in the mire of atheism. Satan, who of course hates God, wants to destroy God. But finding this destruction impossible, he uses the deception that God doesn't exist to soothe his inability. Satan, being cognizant of the terrible punishments that await him, continues his punishable deeds on the deception that the One who will punish him doesn't exist. Since satan wants to make mankind more comfortable in performing deeds God will punish them for, satan, likewise feeds them the deception that God doesn't exist. This is his tactic to make them feel more free to practice the evil deeds they will be punished for. The humans that fall for this deception are always the ones who have a more satanic hatred for God.

[edit] The goal of atheism

Understanding the origin of atheism basically self-explicates it's goals. In more practical terms, here in America atheism acts as a crutch for those who oppose Christianity. Atheism helps confound professing Christians with questions like, "How do you know God exist?", while it, in full knowledge of God, destroys the works of God and of Christianity. Atheists also seek to elude clear linkage with the devil, by also claiming he doesn't exist. Atheism is not about the ignorance of God's existence (no such ignorance exist), but is about ignoring God's existence. As long as atheists can keep trying to make lack of knowledge of God their foundation, they can quickly work to destroy Christians' foundation based on God, without having to buffer themselves from the attacks Christians would make if they (atheists) acknowledged God. In other words, while the "Christian" is scratching his head for an answer on "Prove God exist", atheists, in full knowledge of God, go and destroy the works of Christianity and supplant it with satanism.

Your anwesr was just what I needed. It’s made my day!

Personal tools

דומיין בעברית  דומיין  דומין  תוכנה לניהול  קשרי לקוחות  CRM, ניהול קשרי לקוחות  דומין בעברית  פורומים  ספרדית  גיבוי